Reactions to Reactions
There are many articles and videos circulating of the public’s reactions to Obama’s State of the Union Address.
There are polls out there, like CSB News, who try to gauge public reaction based on those who watched the address. Although, from what I can tell from my own experience and acquaintances, it is usually only supporters, for the most part, who watch such speeches.
Or consider CNN, who spends time assessing Obama’s campaign tone of change. Though it was promised, what can the public really expect? When I hear a president promise such a thing, I hear the character of a man. I hear a man who not only believes change is necessary, but understands, at a fundamental, pragmatic level, how that change can help. What I don’t here, is an absolute certainty that this change will come about. It is not Obama, or any president, who can change an entire political culture. The president’s power is limited to this end. Perhaps if Obama was a dictator, or true socialist, he’d be able to seize the power needed to force Congress to change. This, of course, is a dangerous thing, even if the public thinks that kind of “power” would bring about positive results. It is Congress that will need to ultimately exemplify and execute that shift. Not Obama.
Here are comments from simple Americans, like us. Obama has been unable to accomplish much of what he’s wanted to see change in his first year in office. But if we don’t want a dictator, socialist “president”, as Obama’s been condemned as before, than I think it fair not to judge his results as if he were that dictator. Again, he does not have the power to snap his fingers and magically wash away the disasters of this recession with one gust of power. He doesn’t have it. I think it hypocritical to dislike him as a power-hungry socialist, then turn around and expect him to produce results as if he were one. In my opinion, if you’d like to blame someone, look to the congressperson you voted into the house or senate. It is in those chambers that post partisan Washington will be realized. We have a president who can lead such a Washington, but is not capable of creating it, nor can any other president. Ultimately, a post partisan Washington begins with us – the voters. With many of the “old white men” sitting in Congress for their countless terms, I think it hard to see that kind of change happen – teach old dogs new tricks.
Just because we haven’t seen an economic turn-around within a time frame we WANT, does that mean he is not genuine? That seems illogical. To Obama’s DISCREDIT, I think he has laid out time frames himself that were unrealistic and misleading. Yet this kind of recovery takes time. It’s been 12 months. Though the recession has been the most difficult in the last two years, it has been in the making for arguably over a decade. A full recovery is not within reach in such a short period of time – unless of course you want a dictator with ultimate power to make a couple swift decisions for a superficial and unsustainable recovery.
Again, the bipartisanship. Yes, many of Obama’s major initiatives have been passed with little Republican support. But does that mean Obama is not a central leading president? Not necessarily – as he’s made decisions and moves that have not pleased his own party. This is pragmatic; a show that we are being led not by a smart player in the political game, but by what a man believes to be right. Should we really be blaming Obama for partisan division? Or might we look to those who don’t want to get on board – not with Obama’s exact plans necessarily – but on board with the new Washington game of honest debate and independent thinking.
What about those litte, pot-bellied people watching Obama present the State of the Union face-to-face? When are they going to be held accountable? When are they going to have to answer the tough questions about the direction of this country? Or are we just going to keep treating them like little, bad ass kids who aren’t able to control their own actions; kids will be kids. It’s those damn parents fault! Er, I mean, the president’s fault!







